2,974 rated or chosen profiles from 248 respondents, in up to 6 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.

One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the fair table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description	248 adults recruited at two county fairs in Southwest Pennsylvania (July-August 2021) each chose between 2 government proposals to help fossil fuel workers and communities in 6 tasks; proposals varied in retraining program, retrained salary, retraining time, income support, benefit support, relocation support and community investment.
Reference	Gazmararian, A. F. (2024). Fossil fuel communities support climate policy coupled with just transition assistance. Energy Policy, 184, 113880.
DOI	10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113880
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FC9X6H

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). choice: 'If you had to choose, which proposal would you prefer the government to pursue?' Proposal A/B, forced (no opt-out). Randomized introduction (coal-decline information or not) in trial_intro; cov_survey_weight is the trimmed raking weight that reproduces SI Table 8.1 (the deposited code uses the untrimmed weights2, kept as cov_weight_untrimmed); one unanswered task dropped; 248 respondents as in the SI.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Design

Topic	climate energy environment
A profile represents	policy
Country	US
Language shown	en
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	If you had to choose, which proposal would you prefer the government to pursue? [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_benefit_supportattr_community_investmentattr_free_retraining_programattr_income_support_during_retrainingattr_relocation_supportattr_retrained_worker_salaryattr_worker_retraining_timechoicecov_age_groupcov_attention_passcov_educationcov_faircov_gendercov_party_idcov_survey_weightcov_weight_untrimmedidprofiletasktrial_intro

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("gazmararian_2024_transition_fair", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("gazmararian_2024_transition_fair", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Gazmararian_2024, title={Fossil fuel communities support climate policy coupled with just transition assistance}, volume={184}, ISSN={0301-4215}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113880}, DOI={10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113880}, journal={Energy Policy}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Gazmararian, Alexander F.}, year={2024}, month=Jan, pages={113880} }

Respondents	248
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	2,974
Tasks per respondent (most)	6
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	7
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0

gazmararian_2024_transition_fair