15,310 rated or chosen profiles from 1,531 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 5 attributes.
| Description | Discrete choice experiment on collective investments in multi-apartment buildings: 1,531 Czech residents of housing cooperatives and homeowners' associations (online panel, Sept-Oct 2024) made 5 choices between two investment options varying beneficiaries, personal engagement, decision rule, change in monthly housing costs and change in property value; outcomes are the choice and a 0-100 confidence rating. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Frankowski, J., Stará, S., Bełch, W., Sokołowski, J., Mazurkiewicz, J., Nesládek, M., Prusak, A., & Vácha, T. (2026). Housing conditions, residents' attitudes and preferences towards investments in multi-apartment buildings in Poland and Czechia: ENBLOC survey and discrete choice experiment data [Data set]. Zenodo. |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22097143 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,531 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 15,310 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 5 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | housing neighbourhoods |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | CZ |
| Language shown | cs |
| Language of stored levels | cs |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | In a moment, you will see five sets of choices between two investment options. On each screen, you can choose OPTION A or OPTION B. Please check the option that suits you best. [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating_confidence | To what extent are you confident with your choice? [rating, 0 (0%) to 100 (100%)] |
attr_beneficiaryattr_decisionattr_engagementattr_housing_costattr_property_valuechoicecov_birth_yearcov_duration_seccov_educationcov_gendercov_incomecov_institutioncov_ownercov_polit_beliefidprofilerating_confidencetask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("frankowski_2026_housing_invest_cz", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("frankowski_2026_housing_invest_cz", source="conj")
@misc{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22097143,
doi = {10.5281/ZENODO.22097143},
url = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.22097143},
author = {Frankowski, Jan and Stará, Soňa and Bełch, Wojciech and Sokolowski, Jakub and Mazurkiewicz, Joanna and Nesládek, Michal and Prusak, Aleksandra},
keywords = {housing cooperatives, energy transition, DCE, survey, multi-apartment buildings, Collective Housing, Central Europe, Poland, Czechia},
language = {en},
title = {Housing conditions, residents' attitudes and preferences towards investments in multi-apartment buildings in Poland and Czechia: ENBLOC survey and discrete choice experiment data},
publisher = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International}
}
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |