12,472 rated or chosen profiles from 3,118 respondents, in up to 2 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.

One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the fiscal_union table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description	Italian adults (n = 3,118) chose between pairs of Eurozone fiscal union schemes varying tax rate, tax type, spending destination and type, and spending and auditing institutions (2 pairs), and rated each scheme from strongly against to strongly for.
Reference	Franchino, F., & Segatti, P. (2019). Public opinion on the Eurozone fiscal union: evidence from survey experiments in Italy. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(1), 126-148.
DOI	10.1080/13501763.2017.1400087
Licence	CC BY 4.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5596942

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint_2). choice = 'Between these two schemes, which one do you prefer?' (forced, no opt-out, 2 pairs); rating = for/against each scheme, 1 molto contrario (strongly against) to 4 molto favorevole (strongly for). Task and profile are inferred from row pairs; sample weight kept; N against the article not checked.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	3,118
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	12,472
Tasks per respondent (most)	2
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	6
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	international economy, tax welfare economy
A profile represents	policy
Country	IT
Language shown	it
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	inferred from row order
Profile position	inferred from row order

Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.

Outcomes:

choice	Between these two schemes, which one do you prefer? [choice, forced]
rating	Are you for or against these two schemes? Express your opinion on a scale ranging from "strongly against" to "strongly for" [rating, 1 (strongly against (molto contrario)) to 4 (strongly for (molto favorevole))]

Columns

attr_contrinstattr_spendattr_spendinstattr_spendtypeattr_taxrateattr_taxtypechoicecov_eu_membership_viewcov_survey_weightidprofileratingtask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("franchino_2017_fiscal_union", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("franchino_2017_fiscal_union", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Franchino_2017, title={Public opinion on the Eurozone fiscal union: evidence from survey experiments in Italy}, volume={26}, ISSN={1466-4429}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1400087}, DOI={10.1080/13501763.2017.1400087}, number={1}, journal={Journal of European Public Policy}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Franchino, Fabio and Segatti, Paolo}, year={2017}, month=Nov, pages={126–148} }

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint_2 v1.4
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/hk97-wv30
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v1.4
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0