30,722 responses from 2,806 respondents to 11 items.
About this table
Description
Objective numeracy battery, 11 binary-scored items, US survey respondents; resp_raw carries the original free-text answer. 30,722 responses from 2,806 respondents on 11 items.
Reference
Fitz EB, Stecuła DA, Hitt MP, Saunders KL (2024). Objective numeracy exacerbates framing effects from decision-making under political risk. Scientific reports, 14, 10473. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61099-y
DOI
10.1038/s41598-024-61099-y
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Source data
https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC11076582
Size and shape
Responses
30,722
Respondents
2,806
Items
11
Response categories
2
Responses per respondent
10.949
Responses per item
2792.909
Density
0.995
Longitudinal
FALSE
Classification
sample
Internet-based
measurement tool
Test
item format
Mixed
primary language(s)
eng
Item text
This table has item text in the IRW: the wording administered to respondents, not just the response codes.
Instrument
11-item objective numeracy scale (Fitz & Kim, 2024)
@article{Fitz_2024, title={Objective numeracy exacerbates framing effects from decision-making under political risk}, volume={14}, ISSN={2045-2322}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61099-y}, DOI={10.1038/s41598-024-61099-y}, number={1}, journal={Scientific Reports}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Fitz, Erin B. and Stecuła, Dominik A. and Hitt, Matthew P. and Saunders, Kyle L.}, year={2024}, month=May }