12,660 rated or chosen profiles from 3,171 respondents, in up to 2 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 9 attributes.
One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the norway table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Norwegian adults (Kantar, Jan-Feb 2022, n=3,171) chose between two fictional candidates varying in social traits, policy positions and working-class group appeals, 2 tasks; forced vote choice plus 1-7 ratings of representation and left-right placement. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Finseraas, H., Heath, O., Langsæther, P. E., & Smets, K. (2026). How group appeals shape group-party linkages in two political systems. The Journal of Politics, 88(3), 1264-1269. |
| DOI | 10.1086/735505 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EKM4B3 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 3,171 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 12,660 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 2 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 9 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | NO |
| Language shown | no |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Which of the two candidates do you prefer? (translated) [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating_leftright | On a scale from left to right, where would you place the two candidates? (translated) [rating, 1 (Helt til venstre) to 7 (Helt til høyre)] |
| rating_represent | To what extent do you feel the two candidates represent people like you? (translated) [rating, 1 (Ikke i det hele tatt) to 7 (I svært stor grad)] |
attr_abortionattr_ageattr_born_raisedattr_climateattr_economicattr_genderattr_group_appealattr_immigrationattr_occupationchoicecov_gendercov_leftright_scaledcov_universitycov_vote_conservativecov_working_classidprofilerating_leftrightrating_representtask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("finseraas_2026_group_appeals_norway", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("finseraas_2026_group_appeals_norway", source="conj")
@article{Finseraas_2026, title={How Group Appeals Shape Group–Party Linkages in Two Political Systems}, volume={88}, ISSN={1468-2508}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735505}, DOI={10.1086/735505}, number={3}, journal={The Journal of Politics}, publisher={University of Chicago Press}, author={Finseraas, Henning and Heath, Oliver and Langsæther, Peter Egge and Smets, Kaat}, year={2026}, month=July, pages={1264–1269} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |