9,892 rated or chosen profiles from 496 respondents, in up to 10 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.

One of 3 tables from the same source; this one is the india table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description	Women of reproductive age in New Delhi, India (n = 496; 2017-2018, interviewer-administered on a tablet) chose between two options of a hypothetical contraceptive microarray patch in 10 discrete-choice tasks, options described by 6 attributes (pain, skin reaction, location, size, duration of protection, effect on menstruation) with illustrations; level text in Hindi.
Reference	FHI 360. (2020). Discreet choice experiment survey for development of a contraceptive microarray patch in India and Nigeria (FHI360 2017-2018) [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse.
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TOSSWN

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). choice: "Which of these methods do you prefer?" (English master questionnaire; asked in Hindi), forced choice between two patch options, no None option. Level text is the Hindi text shown (each level also had an illustration), decoded from the Sawtooth design and study files. The fixed holdout task and unanswered tasks are dropped; 31 respondents without a design version dropped. 496 respondents.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	496
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	9,892
Tasks per respondent (most)	10
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	6
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	health covid
A profile represents	product service
Country	IN
Language shown	hi
Language of stored levels	hi
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Look carefully at the features of the two method options. Which of these methods do you prefer? (translated) [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_durationattr_locationattr_menstruationattr_painattr_sizeattr_skin_reactionchoiceidprofiletask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("fhi360_2020_mnp_india", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("fhi360_2020_mnp_india", source="conj")

How to cite

@misc{https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/tosswn,
  doi = {10.7910/DVN/TOSSWN},
  url = {https://dataverse.harvard.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/TOSSWN},
  author = {{FHI 360}},
  keywords = {Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, DCE, choice, preference, contraception, microarray patch, India, Nigeria},
  title = {Discreet Choice Experiment Survey for Development of a Contraceptive Microarray Patch in India and Nigeria (FHI360 2017-2018)},
  publisher = {Harvard Dataverse},
  year = {2020}
}

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0