3,746 rated or chosen profiles from 626 respondents, in up to 3 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 5 attributes.

One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the councilors table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description	Paired conjoint on asylum-seeker host sites in Greece: 626 municipal councilors compared 3 pairs of proposals for a site in their municipality varying proximity to the centre, size, type (open/closed), operator and compensating public goods; outcomes are the preferred proposal and a 0-7 rating of each proposal.
Reference	Fabbe, K., Kyrkopoulou, E., & Vidali, M. E. (2025). Between human dignity and security: Identifying citizen and elite preferences and concerns over refugee reception. Comparative Political Studies.
DOI	10.1177/00104140251381741
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5CSZWG

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). Three paired proposals for an asylum-seeker host site; choice = the preferred proposal (A or B) (paraphrase; forced, no opt-out), rating = each proposal on a 0-7 scale (anchors not deposited; higher = more support, agrees with the choice in ~95% of pairs). Levels Greek as exported; 25 non-responders omitted; N = 626 vs 586 reported; answered task-3 choice kept (authors impute it from ratings).

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	626
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	3,746
Tasks per respondent (most)	3
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	5
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	immigration asylum
A profile represents	policy
Country	GR
Language shown	el
Language of stored levels	el
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Which proposal do you prefer: Proposal A or Proposal B? (paraphrase) [choice, forced]
rating	How much do you support this proposal? (paraphrase) [rating, 0 (unknown) to 7 (unknown)]

Columns

attr_proximityattr_public_goodsattr_run_byattr_sizeattr_typeattrpos_proximityattrpos_public_goodsattrpos_run_byattrpos_sizeattrpos_typechoicecov_birth_yearcov_educationcov_gendercov_left_rightcov_party_idcov_regionidprofileratingtask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("fabbe_2025_refugee_sites_councilors", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("fabbe_2025_refugee_sites_councilors", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Fabbe_2025, title={Between Human Dignity and Security: Identifying Citizen and Elite Preferences and Concerns Over Refugee Reception}, volume={59}, ISSN={1552-3829}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00104140251381741}, DOI={10.1177/00104140251381741}, number={11}, journal={Comparative Political Studies}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Fabbe, Kristin E. and Kyrkopoulou, Eleni and Vidali, Mara E.}, year={2025}, month=Sept, pages={2495–2536} }

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0