18,654 rated or chosen profiles from 1,591 respondents, in up to 6 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 9 attributes.
| Description | Democracy-promotion conjoint: 1,591 US adults on Prolific (2017 records) each saw up to 6 pairs of hypothetical autocratic countries varying oil, US alliance, trade ties, regime age, power concentration, leader type, elections, religion and military strength, and said yes/no to US military intervention, economic sanctions and democracy aid for each country. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Escribà-Folch, A., Muradova, L. H., & Rodon, T. (2021). The effects of autocratic characteristics on public opinion toward democracy promotion policies: A conjoint analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis, 17(1), 140-161. |
| DOI | 10.1093/fpa/oraa016 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KGSGPW |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,591 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 18,654 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 6 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 9 |
| Topic | foreign policy security |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | place |
| Country | US |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| rating_democracy_aid | Even if you aren't entirely sure, please indicate whether you would support the use of these foreign policies (i.e., military intervention, economic sanctions or foreign aid) in each of the two cases separately. [democracy aid: yes/no] (paraphrase) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
|---|---|
| rating_economic_sanctions | Even if you aren't entirely sure, please indicate whether you would support the use of these foreign policies (i.e., military intervention, economic sanctions or foreign aid) in each of the two cases separately. [economic sanctions: yes/no] (paraphrase) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
| rating_military_intervention | Even if you aren't entirely sure, please indicate whether you would support the use of these foreign policies (i.e., military intervention, economic sanctions or foreign aid) in each of the two cases separately. [military intervention: yes/no] (paraphrase) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)] |
attr_allyattr_electionsattr_leaderattr_militaryattr_oilattr_powerattr_religionattr_tradeattr_yearsattrpos_allyattrpos_electionsattrpos_leaderattrpos_militaryattrpos_oilattrpos_powerattrpos_religionattrpos_tradeattrpos_yearscov_agecov_educationcov_gendercov_ideologycov_party_ididprofilerating_democracy_aidrating_economic_sanctionsrating_military_interventiontasktrial_wave
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("escribafolch_2021_democracy_promotion", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("escribafolch_2021_democracy_promotion", source="conj")
@article{Escrib_Folch_2020, title={The Effects of Autocratic Characteristics on Public Opinion toward Democracy Promotion Policies: A Conjoint Analysis}, volume={17}, ISSN={1743-8594}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa016}, DOI={10.1093/fpa/oraa016}, number={1}, journal={Foreign Policy Analysis}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Escribà-Folch, Abel and Muradova, Lala H and Rodon, Toni}, year={2020}, month=Aug, pages={140–161} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |