29,990 rated or chosen profiles from 2,999 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.
One of 3 tables from the same source; this one is the spain table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Adults in Spain (bilendi online panel, 2022; n = 2,999) chose between and rated (1-7) 5 pairs of hypothetical trade agreements varying in yearly gains or losses (euro) for themselves, the average citizen and the average citizen of the partner country, plus partner size, current trade volume and implementation year. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Dür, A., Hee, S., & Huber, R. A. (2025). A fair deal: Inequity aversion and individual attitudes toward trade agreements. The Review of International Organizations. |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11558-025-09597-0 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TBTCPB |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 2,999 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 29,990 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 6 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | international economy |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | ES |
| Language shown | es |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): No agreement with losses on all three payoff attributes (personal, citizen, foreign; 1.45% of payoff combinations); a profile was redrawn if it matched the other profile on all three payoffs. Payoff values drawn in steps of 10 from -100 to 300 (euro; x5 in zloty in Poland). |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| choice | Which of the two trade agreements do you prefer? (paraphrase; the article: respondents were asked 'to choose between and to rate (on a scale from 1 to 7) two hypothetical trade agreements') [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating | Rating of each agreement on a scale from 1 to 7 (paraphrase; article Sec. 4.1) [rating, 1 (muy en contra) to 7 (muy a favor)] |
attr_gain_citizenattr_gain_foreignattr_gain_personalattr_implementationattr_partner_sizeattr_trade_volumechoicecov_agecov_educationcov_employmentcov_gendercov_hhsizecov_id_countrycov_id_eucov_id_neighborcov_id_regioncov_income_codecov_loicov_lreconcov_pol_interestcov_regionidprofileratingtask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("dur_2025_trade_spain", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("dur_2025_trade_spain", source="conj")
@article{D_r_2025, title={A fair deal: Inequity aversion and individual attitudes toward trade agreements}, ISSN={1559-744X}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11558-025-09597-0}, DOI={10.1007/s11558-025-09597-0}, journal={The Review of International Organizations}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Dür, Andreas and Hee, Stefan and Huber, Robert A.}, year={2025}, month=July }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |