Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., & Doherty, M. (2021). Measuring divergent thinking originality with human raters and text-mining models: A psychometric comparison of methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4), 645.
DOI
10.1037/aca0000319
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Source data
https://osf.io/qcmex/
Size and shape
Responses
21,960
Respondents
92
Items
10
Response categories
5
Responses per respondent
238.696
Responses per item
2,196
Density
23.870
Longitudinal
FALSE
Classification
age range
Mixed
sample
Educational, Targeted/specific
construct type
Cognitive/educational
measurement tool
Survey/questionnaire
item format
Constructed Response
primary language(s)
eng
construct name
Measuring divergent thinking originality with human raters and text-mining models
Item text
This table has item text in the IRW: the wording administered to respondents, not just the response codes.
Mean words per item
1
Mean characters per item
4.700
Mean characters per response
7.400
Flesch-Kincaid grade level
20.430
Codebook
This codebook is reconstructed by the IRW from the IRW data standard and the script that built it, dumas_Organisciak_2022.R. It is our best reading, not the source’s own codebook, and it may contain mistakes. Where the two disagree, the source data are the authority. If you find an error, please tell us.
Column
What it is
Source column
IRW standard columns
id
IRW standard Identifier for the focal unit being measured — typically a person, but sometimes another entity (e.g., a word in a lexical task).
@article{Dumas_2021, title={Measuring divergent thinking originality with human raters and text-mining models: A psychometric comparison of methods.}, volume={15}, ISSN={1931-3896}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000319}, DOI={10.1037/aca0000319}, number={4}, journal={Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts}, publisher={American Psychological Association (APA)}, author={Dumas, Denis and Organisciak, Peter and Doherty, Michael}, year={2021}, month=nov, pages={645–663} }