37,460 rated or chosen profiles from 9,365 respondents, in up to 2 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 5 attributes.
| Description | Guatemalan household-survey respondents (n = 9,365, 14 departments) saw 2 pairs of crime scenarios varying victim gender, crime type, perpetrator type, perpetrator's community and perpetrator gender, and chose the case where community rather than police punishment would be better and the case deserving more severe punishment. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Dow, D., Levy, G., Romero, D., & Tellez, J. (2023). State absence, vengeance, and the logic of vigilantism in Guatemala. Comparative Political Studies, 57(1), 147-181. |
| DOI | 10.1177/00104140231169026 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/M9WUK8 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 9,365 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 37,460 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 2 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 5 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | crime justice policing |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | scenario |
| Country | GT |
| Language shown | es |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Of the two scenarios, in which case do you think it would be better for someone in the community rather than the police to punish the perpetrator directly? Even if you aren't completely sure, choose one of the two cases. [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| choice_punish | And of the two scenarios, which case do you think should be punished more severely? [choice, forced] |
attr_crimeattr_perpetratorattr_perpetrator_genderattr_social_distanceattr_victim_genderchoicechoice_punishcov_agecov_basic_expensescov_departmentcov_educationcov_enumerator_gendercov_gendercov_mano_duracov_rape_changecov_sexual_assaultcov_war_paccov_war_victimcov_women_leadersidprofiletask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("dow_2023_vigilantism", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("dow_2023_vigilantism", source="conj")
@article{Dow_2023, title={State Absence, Vengeance, and the Logic of Vigilantism in Guatemala}, volume={57}, ISSN={1552-3829}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00104140231169026}, DOI={10.1177/00104140231169026}, number={1}, journal={Comparative Political Studies}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Dow, David A. and Levy, Gabriella and Romero, Diego and Tellez, Juan Fernando}, year={2023}, month=May, pages={147–181} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |