double_marking_steele_2022

3,339 responses from 288 respondents to 6 items.

About this table

DescriptionExploring the Value of Double Marking in Dissertation Assessments
ReferenceSteele, J., Shaw, M., & Shaw, M. (2022, September 29). Exploring the Value of Double Marking in Dissertation Assessments. Retrieved from osf.io/nd3k8
DOI10.35542/osf.io/ug7yb
LicenceCC BY 4.0
Source datahttps://osf.io/nd3k8/overview

Size and shape

Responses3,339
Respondents288
Items6
Response categories18
Responses per respondent11.594
Responses per item556.500
Density1.932
LongitudinalTRUE

Classification

age rangeAdult (18+)
sampleInternet-based
construct typeCognitive/educational
measurement toolObservational rating
item formatLikert Scale/selected response
primary language(s)eng
construct nameThe Value of Double Marking in Dissertation Assessment

Item text

This table has item text in the IRW: the wording administered to respondents, not just the response codes.

InstrumentExploring the Value of Double Marking in Dissertation Assessments
Mean words per item1
Mean characters per item9.093
Mean characters per response92.333
Flesch-Kincaid grade level59.526

Columns

iditemraterrespwave

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python:

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("double_marking_steele_2022")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("double_marking_steele_2022")

Version and provenance

IRW versionv393
Redivis datasetitem_response_warehouse_2 v19.0
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qtx5-4m80
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv19.0
Metadata sourceirw_meta v23.0