25,120 rated or chosen profiles from 2,512 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.

About this table

Description	US MTurk workers (July 2016; n=2,512) chose between 5 pairs of hypothetical trade agreements described by effects on US jobs, US growth and partner growth and by the partner's regime and wealth; two of three randomized arms added the agreement's effect on US global influence or the partner's security relationship to the US.
Reference	DiGiuseppe, M., & Kleinberg, K. B. (2018). Economics, security, and individual-level preferences for trade agreements. International Interactions, 45(2), 289-315.
DOI	10.1080/03050629.2019.1551007
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0HST44

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). choice is a forced choice of the preferred trade agreement (wording paraphrased in the article; instrument appendix not available), no opt-out. Three randomized arms (trial_arm): the global-influence and relationship attributes appear only in their own arm and are (not shown) elsewhere. One respondent with no regime values dropped; Qualtrics IDs, timings and the authors' derived dummies dropped.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	2,512
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	25,120
Tasks per respondent (most)	5
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	6
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	international economy
A profile represents	policy
Country	US
Language shown	en
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Indicate which trade agreement you prefer (paraphrase) [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_global_influenceattr_jobsattr_partner_growthattr_regime_economyattr_relationshipattr_us_growthchoicecov_agecov_attention_pass_1cov_attention_pass_2cov_gendercov_raceidprofiletasktrial_arm

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("digiuseppe_2018_trade_agreements", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("digiuseppe_2018_trade_agreements", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{DiGiuseppe_2018, title={Economics, security, and individual-level preferences for trade agreements}, volume={45}, ISSN={1547-7444}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2019.1551007}, DOI={10.1080/03050629.2019.1551007}, number={2}, journal={International Interactions}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={DiGiuseppe, Matthew and Kleinberg, Katja B.}, year={2018}, month=Dec, pages={289–315} }

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0