CPDMMC_Kunnari_2020_HCD

12,516 responses from 1,043 respondents to 12 items.

About this table

DescriptionHigh-conflict Dilemmas
ReferenceKunnari, A., Sundvall, J. R., & Laakasuo, M. (2020). Challenges in process dissociation measures for moral cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 559934.
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559934
LicenceCC BY 4.0
Source datahttps://osf.io/vmy4q/

Size and shape

Responses12,516
Respondents1,043
Items12
Response categories7
Responses per respondent12
Responses per item1,043
Density1
LongitudinalFALSE

Classification

age rangeAdult (18+)
sampleGeneral/non-specific, Internet-based
construct typeCognitive/educational
measurement toolTest
item formatLikert Scale/selected response
primary language(s)eng
construct nameUtilitarian Inclinations and Deontological Inclinations in moral judgment, measured via the Process Dissociation Procedure

Item text

This table has item text in the IRW: the wording administered to respondents, not just the response codes.

InstrumentHigh-Conflict Moral Dilemmas (Greene et al., 2004 battery)
Mean words per item22.750
Mean characters per item120.167
Mean characters per response7
Flesch-Kincaid grade level10.326

Columns

iditemresp

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python:

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("CPDMMC_Kunnari_2020_HCD")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("CPDMMC_Kunnari_2020_HCD")

Version and provenance

IRW versionv393
Redivis datasetitem_response_warehouse v53.0
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/4g08-xt41
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv53.0
Metadata sourceirw_meta v23.0