6,072 rated or chosen profiles from 1,012 respondents, in up to 3 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 9 attributes.
One of 6 tables from the same source; this one is the jp table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Respondents in Japan (n = 1,012) compared 3 pairs of hypothetical countries described by 9 three-level attributes (elections, civil liberties, executive constraints, populism, obedience, economic and gender equality, expert influence, direct democracy); outcomes: which country is more democratic, and a 1-10 democracy rating of each. One of six country tables from the same study. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Chu, J. A., Williamson, S., & Yeung, E. S. F. (2024). People consistently view elections and civil liberties as key components of democracy. Science, 386(6719), 291-296. |
| DOI | 10.1126/science.adp1274 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WUJCBO |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,012 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 6,072 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 3 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 9 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | democracy institutions |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | place |
| Country | JP |
| Language shown | ja |
| Language of stored levels | ja |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | 2つの国のうち、どちらがより民主的だと思いますか？ [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating | 国Aはどの程度民主的だと思いますか？ [rating, 1 (まったく民主的でない) to 10 (完全に民主的)] |
attr_civilattr_directattr_econattr_electionattr_expertattr_gender_equalityattr_leaderattr_obedientattr_populistattrpos_civilattrpos_directattrpos_econattrpos_electionattrpos_expertattrpos_gender_equalityattrpos_leaderattrpos_obedientattrpos_populistchoicecov_agecov_china_uscov_democracy_importancecov_educationcov_gendercov_ideologycov_minoritycov_party_idcov_pol_interestidprofileratingtask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("chu_2024_democracy_jp", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("chu_2024_democracy_jp", source="conj")
@article{Chu_2024, title={People consistently view elections and civil liberties as key components of democracy}, volume={386}, ISSN={1095-9203}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.adp1274}, DOI={10.1126/science.adp1274}, number={6719}, journal={Science}, publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)}, author={Chu, Jonathan A. and Williamson, Scott and Yeung, Eddy S. F.}, year={2024}, month=Oct, pages={291–296} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |