28,872 rated or chosen profiles from 2,406 respondents, in up to 6 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.
| Description | Finnish respondents chose between pairs of political leaders varying in stance on media freedom, welfare spending, adoption rights and climate policy, plus gender, age and education, then said whether they would vote for the chosen leader; 2,406 respondents, 6 tasks each. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Christensen, H. S., & Saikkonen, I. (2023). Replication data: Does democratic backsliding depend on the policy issue [Data set]. OSF. |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/jn5kz |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 2,406 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 28,872 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 6 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 7 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | FI |
| Language shown | fi |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Choice of one of two political leader profiles (paraphrase; wording not in deposit) [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| choice_vote | Would vote for selected profile (paraphrase; .dta variable label of `votes`, No/Yes, asked about the chosen profile) [choice, opt-out allowed] |
attr_adoption_rightsattr_ageattr_climateattr_educationattr_genderattr_media_freedomattr_welfarechoicechoice_votecov_agecov_age_groupcov_auth1cov_auth10cov_auth11cov_auth12cov_auth2cov_auth3cov_auth4cov_auth5cov_auth6cov_auth7cov_auth8cov_auth9cov_authpar1cov_authpar2cov_authpar3cov_demideal_electcov_demideal_ineqcov_demideal_mediacov_demideal_oppocov_demideal_polpartcov_demsatcov_educationcov_eff_1cov_eff_2cov_eff_3cov_eff_4cov_eff_5cov_gendercov_has_partycov_ideologycov_party_idcov_polintcov_polpos_climacov_polpos_nordiccov_polpos_pesticov_polpos_regulcov_polpos_sexucov_polpos_welfcov_poltrst_govcov_poltrst_parlcov_poltrst_partycov_poltrst_polcov_provincecov_regionidprofiletasktrial_design_version
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("christensen_2023_backsliding_issues", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("christensen_2023_backsliding_issues", source="conj")
@article{https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/jn5kz,
doi = {10.17605/OSF.IO/JN5KZ},
url = {https://osf.io/jn5kz/},
author = {Saikkonen, Inga and Christensen, Henrik Serup},
keywords = {Conjoint, Democracy, Democratic backsliding, Democratic norms, Populism, Public opinion},
title = {Replication data Does Democratic Backsliding Depend on the Policy Issue},
publisher = {OSF},
year = {2020},
copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International}
}
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |