12,576 rated or chosen profiles from 1,048 respondents, in up to 6 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.

About this table

Description	Paired conjoint on online participatory platforms: 1,048 Finnish adults (Qualtrics panel, 2019) chose between two hypothetical platforms six times, varying discussions, interaction with politicians, information, decision-making role, identity verification, anonymity and accessibility; outcomes are a forced choice and whether they would participate on the chosen platform.
Reference	Christensen, H. S. (2021). A conjoint experiment of how design features affect evaluations of participatory platforms. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101538.
DOI	10.1016/j.giq.2020.101538
Licence	CC BY 4.0
Source data	https://osf.io/fm9xp/

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). Six pairs of online participatory platforms; choice = the platform the respondent would like to see introduced (forced choice, no opt-out); rating_participate = follow-up, asked only for the chosen platform, whether the respondent would participate on it (1 yes / 0 no; NA on the unchosen profile). Levels are the preprint's English Table 1 wording (Finnish display text not deposited); restrictions not documented. N = 1,048 as in the article; the article's AMCEs (strong verification +0.16, anonymity +0.093) reproduce.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	1,048
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	12,576
Tasks per respondent (most)	6
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	7
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	democracy institutions
A profile represents	product service
Country	FI
Language shown	fi
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Choose from the alternatives below the platform you would like to see implemented. (translated) [choice, forced]
rating_participate	Would you also participate on the selected platform? (paraphrase) [rating, 0 (no) to 1 (yes)]

Columns

attr_accessibilityattr_anonymityattr_discussionsattr_informationattr_interactionattr_roleattr_verificationchoicecov_age_groupcov_internet_timeidprofilerating_participatetask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("christensen_2021_online_platforms", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("christensen_2021_online_platforms", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Christensen_2021, title={A conjoint experiment of how design features affect evaluations of participatory platforms}, volume={38}, ISSN={0740-624X}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101538}, DOI={10.1016/j.giq.2020.101538}, number={1}, journal={Government Information Quarterly}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Christensen, Henrik Serup}, year={2021}, month=Jan, pages={101538} }

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0