3,440 rated or chosen profiles from 215 respondents, in up to 8 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.
| Description | Choice experiment on parcel delivery: 215 Dutch online respondents (mostly students) chose between a crowdshipping delivery (varying delivery time, cost, tracking, company reputation, insurance, damage risk) and a fixed traditional delivery, and rated their trust in crowdshipping; 8 tasks each. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Cebeci, M. S., Tapia, R. J., Kroesen, M., de Bok, M., & Tavasszy, L. (2023). The effect of trust on the choice for crowdshipping services. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 170, 103622. |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103622 |
| Licence | CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.4121/b1cd5e55-c3c2-4d5b-8ec7-58f071f53b6e.v2 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 215 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 3,440 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 8 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 7 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | consumer products |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | product service |
| Country | NL |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | inferred from row order |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| choice | From the available delivery options below, select the one that fits your preference most. Would you consider making use of this crowdshipping service? Yes / No (I would use traditional delivery) [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating_trust | Based on the above mentioned scenario, how much would you trust crowdshipping? [rating, 1 (Strongly distrustful) to 5 (Strongly trustful)] |
attr_damageattr_delivery_costattr_delivery_timeattr_insuranceattr_reputationattr_serviceattr_trackingchoicecov_age_codecov_education_codecov_gender_codecov_income_codecov_occupation_codeidprofilerating_trusttasktrial_block
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — non-commercial use only; adaptations must be shared under the same licence.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("cebeci_2023_crowdshipping_trust", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("cebeci_2023_crowdshipping_trust", source="conj")
@article{Cebeci_2023, title={The effect of trust on the choice for crowdshipping services}, volume={170}, ISSN={0965-8564}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103622}, DOI={10.1016/j.tra.2023.103622}, journal={Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Cebeci, Merve Seher and Tapia, Rodrigo Javier and Kroesen, Maarten and de Bok, Michiel and Tavasszy, Lóránt}, year={2023}, month=Apr, pages={103622} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint_2 v1.4 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/hk97-wv30 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v1.4 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |