11,610 rated or chosen profiles from 622 respondents, in up to 10 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.
One of 3 tables from the same source; this one is the donors table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Partisan political donors (Bright Line Watch donor sample, Qualtrics, Feb-Apr 2019) chose between two hypothetical candidates in 10 pairs varying name (signalling race and gender), party, and six platform statements on voter-ID laws, investigations, compromise, courts, discrimination and taxes. 622 respondents (authors' analysis sample 573); binary choice. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Carey, J., Clayton, K., Helmke, G., Nyhan, B., Sanders, M., & Stokes, S. (2020). Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. |
| DOI | 10.1080/17457289.2020.1790577 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MRWYC2 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 622 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 11,610 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 10 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 8 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | US |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Based on the information above, which of the following two candidates would you be more likely to support? [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_compromiseattr_courtsattr_discriminationattr_electionsattr_investigationsattr_nameattr_partyattr_taxesattrpos_compromiseattrpos_courtsattrpos_discriminationattrpos_electionsattrpos_investigationsattrpos_taxeschoicecov_age_groupcov_duration_seccov_educationcov_finishedcov_gendercov_hispaniccov_ideologycov_party_idcov_racecov_take_seriouscov_trump_approvalcov_us_residentidprofiletask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("carey_2020_democracy_donors", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("carey_2020_democracy_donors", source="conj")
@article{Carey_2020, title={Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters}, volume={32}, ISSN={1745-7297}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2020.1790577}, DOI={10.1080/17457289.2020.1790577}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Carey, John and Clayton, Katherine and Helmke, Gretchen and Nyhan, Brendan and Sanders, Mitchell and Stokes, Susan}, year={2020}, month=July, pages={230–245} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |