cai_2026_contract_repair_s1

257 rated or chosen profiles from 257 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 1 profile varying on 3 attributes.

One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the s1 table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

Description257 Chinese full-time employees each read one vignette of a manager who broke a promise about a management-training place and then repaired it; repair tactic, repair speed and pre-violation trust in the manager were varied (2x2x2). Outcomes: eight 1-5 psychological-contract-violation items toward the manager and the company.
ReferenceCai, Z. (2026). Psychological contract violation recovery [Data set]. figshare.
LicenceCC BY 4.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32664582

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents257
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)257
Tasks per respondent (most)1
Profiles per task1
Attributes3

Design

Topicother
A profile representsscenario
CountryCN
Language shownzh
Language of stored levelsen
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positionrecorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

rating_mgr_angryI am very angry at how Manager Wang treated me (translated) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 5 (unknown)]
rating_mgr_betrayedI feel betrayed by Manager Wang (translated) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 5 (unknown)]
rating_mgr_contract_violatedI feel Manager Wang violated the contract between us (translated) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 5 (unknown)]
rating_mgr_frustratedI am very frustrated by how Manager Wang treated me (translated) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 5 (unknown)]
rating_org_angryI am very angry at how K Company treated me (translated) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 5 (unknown)]
rating_org_betrayedI feel betrayed by K Company (translated) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 5 (unknown)]
rating_org_contract_violatedI feel K Company violated the contract between us (translated) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 5 (unknown)]
rating_org_frustratedI am very frustrated by how K Company treated me (translated) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 5 (unknown)]

Columns

attr_pre_violation_trustattr_repair_tacticattr_repair_velocitycov_age_groupcov_educationcov_gendercov_tenure_yearscov_work_yearsidprofilerating_mgr_angryrating_mgr_betrayedrating_mgr_contract_violatedrating_mgr_frustratedrating_org_angryrating_org_betrayedrating_org_contract_violatedrating_org_frustratedtask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("cai_2026_contract_repair_s1", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("cai_2026_contract_repair_s1", source="conj")

How to cite

@misc{https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32664582,
  doi = {10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.32664582},
  url = {https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Study_2/32664582},
  author = {Cai, Zhiyuan},
  keywords = {Personality and individual differences},
  title = {psychological contract violation recovery},
  publisher = {figshare},
  year = {2026},
  copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International}
}

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint_2 v1.4
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/hk97-wv30
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv1.4
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0