22,720 rated or chosen profiles from 2,272 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.
One of 10 tables from the same source; this one is the brazil table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Brazilian adults (TGM Research online panel, July 2024) chose between 5 pairs of hypothetical foreign investment projects varying the firm's country of origin (China, USA, Japan, India, Saudi Arabia), project type, local jobs, migrant workers, labor-rights record, environmental plan and bribery accusations. 2,272 respondents; forced choice; levels in Portuguese as displayed. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Bulman, D., Leng, N., & Ratigan, K. (2025). Firm's source country or project characteristics? Survey experiments on preferences for Chinese investment in the Global South. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 18(3), 267. |
| DOI | 10.1093/cjip/poaf006 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YGXPVC |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 2,272 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 22,720 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 7 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | international economy |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | BR |
| Language shown | pt |
| Language of stored levels | pt |
| Randomization restrictions | observed in the data (not documented by the source): The migrant-workers level names the firm's country of origin ('20 workers from China'), so source country and migrant country always coincide (checked); no source states other rules; other level pairs all occur. |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| choice | Which project do you prefer? (paraphrase) [choice, forced] |
|---|
attr_briberyattr_environment_planattr_labor_violationsattr_local_jobsattr_migrant_workersattr_project_typeattr_sourceattrpos_briberyattrpos_environment_planattrpos_labor_violationsattrpos_local_jobsattrpos_migrant_workersattrpos_project_typeattrpos_sourcechoicecov_age_group_codecov_aware_chinese_projectcov_collegecov_gendercov_income_codecov_left_rightcov_region_codecov_urbancov_user_languagecov_voted_incumbentidprofiletasktrial_language
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("bulman_2025_fdi_brazil", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("bulman_2025_fdi_brazil", source="conj")
@article{Bulman_2025, title={Firm’s Source Country or Project Characteristics? Survey Experiments on Preferences for Chinese Investment in the Global South}, volume={18}, ISSN={1750-8924}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poaf006}, DOI={10.1093/cjip/poaf006}, number={3}, journal={The Chinese Journal of International Politics}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Bulman, David Janoff and Leng, Ning and Ratigan, Kerry}, year={2025}, pages={267–293} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |