28,310 rated or chosen profiles from 2,831 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 5 attributes.

About this table

Description	Swiss car holders (n=2,831; 950 with a battery-electric vehicle in the household) chose which of two public charging stations to use, varying waiting time, charging time, energy source, amenities and price; 5 tasks x 2 profiles, forced choice.
Reference	Brückmann, G., & Bernauer, T. (2023). An experimental analysis of consumer preferences towards public charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 121, 103626.
DOI	10.1016/j.trd.2023.103626
Licence	CC BY 4.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18232567

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint_2). Forced choice between two charging stations ("Which charging station would you use?", German; no opt-out), 5 tasks. Waiting time is a set of 2 or 3 possible values (shown as text, e.g. '0 or 5 or 10 min'); amenities text is taken from the article. Profile 1/2 is inferred from the file's _c2/_c3 suffix. N = 2,831 respondents, as in the paper.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	2,831
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	28,310
Tasks per respondent (most)	5
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	5
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	climate energy environment
A profile represents	product service
Country	CH
Language shown	de
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	inferred from row order

Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.

Outcomes:

choice	Welche Ladestation würden Sie nutzen? (Ladestation A / Ladestation B) (translated: Which charging station would you use?) [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_amenitiesattr_charging_timeattr_energy_sourceattr_priceattr_queueing_time_minchoicecov_bev_in_householdcov_birth_yearcov_gendercov_household_incomecov_panel_samplecov_political_left_rightidprofiletask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("brueckmann_2023_charging_stations", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("brueckmann_2023_charging_stations", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Br_ckmann_2023, title={An experimental analysis of consumer preferences towards public charging infrastructure}, volume={116}, ISSN={1361-9209}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103626}, DOI={10.1016/j.trd.2023.103626}, journal={Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Brückmann, Gracia and Bernauer, Thomas}, year={2023}, month=Mar, pages={103626} }

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint_2 v1.4
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/hk97-wv30
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v1.4
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0