19,166 rated or chosen profiles from 2,424 respondents, in up to 4 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.
| Description | Argentine online panel respondents (IPSOS; n = 2,424, 2,267 after the authors' speed rule) chose between two hypothetical critical-mineral mining projects in 4 tasks and rated each 1-5 stars; projects varied in local community (agricultural/indigenous), owner (YPF/Chinese/North American), new jobs, importance for green technologies, damage to water and soil, and government tax incentives. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Brooks, S. M., Lacroix Eussler, S., & Voeten, E. (2026). Environmental, economic, and geopolitical trade-offs in critical mineral mining projects: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Argentina. The Extractive Industries and Society, 27, 101925. |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.exis.2026.101925 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TSNBBM |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 2,424 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 19,166 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 4 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 6 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | climate energy environment |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | AR |
| Language shown | es |
| Language of stored levels | es |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | ¿Qué proyecto es mejor? [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating | Califica cada proyecto de 1 estrella (malo) a 5 estrellas (bueno) [rating, 0 (1 estrella (malo)) to 5 (5 estrellas (bueno))] |
attr_communityattr_damageattr_greenattr_jobsattr_ownerattr_taxattrpos_communityattrpos_damageattrpos_greenattrpos_jobsattrpos_ownerattrpos_taxchoicecov_age_groupcov_attention_passcov_duration_seccov_education_household_headcov_gendercov_provincecov_vote_first_roundidprofileratingtasktrial_delegate
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("brooks_2026_mining_argentina", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("brooks_2026_mining_argentina", source="conj")
@article{Brooks_2026, title={Environmental, economic, and geopolitical trade-offs in critical mineral mining projects: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Argentina}, volume={27}, ISSN={2214-790X}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2026.101925}, DOI={10.1016/j.exis.2026.101925}, journal={The Extractive Industries and Society}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Brooks, Sarah M. and Lacroix Eussler, Santiago and Voeten, Erik}, year={2026}, month=Sept, pages={101925} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |