23,800 responses from 680 respondents to 35 items.
About this table
Description
Contingencies of Self-Worth Scale (Crocker et al. 2003), 35 items (1-7) across seven domains, 680 university students in Brussels; the seven negatively worded items are stored already reverse-scored
Reference
Briganti, G., Fried, E. I., & Linkowski, P. (2019). Network analysis of Contingencies of Self-Worth Scale in 680 university students. Psychiatry Research, 272, 252-257.
DOI
10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.080
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Source data
https://osf.io/73c4q/
Size and shape
Responses
23,800
Respondents
680
Items
35
Response categories
7
Responses per respondent
35
Responses per item
680
Density
1
Longitudinal
FALSE
Classification
sample
Educational
measurement tool
Survey/questionnaire
item format
Likert Scale/selected response
Codebook
This codebook is reconstructed by the IRW from the IRW data standard and the script that built it, briganti_2019_csws.py. It is our best reading, not the source’s own codebook, and it may contain mistakes. Where the two disagree, the source data are the authority. If you find an error, please tell us.
Column
What it is
Source column
IRW standard columns
id
IRW standard Identifier for the focal unit being measured — typically a person, but sometimes another entity (e.g., a word in a lexical task).
@article{Briganti_2019, title={Network analysis of Contingencies of Self-Worth Scale in 680 university students}, volume={272}, ISSN={0165-1781}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.080}, DOI={10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.080}, journal={Psychiatry Research}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Briganti, Giovanni and Fried, Eiko I. and Linkowski, Paul}, year={2019}, month=Feb, pages={252–257} }