1,680 rated or chosen profiles from 140 respondents, in up to 12 tasks of 1 profile varying on 11 attributes.
| Description | Factorial clinical-vignette survey: 140 Dutch primary-care providers (60 GPs, 80 practice nurses, 2014) each rated 12 text vignettes of a COPD or diabetes patient varying 11 patient factors, on the likelihood of providing self-management support, its expected success, and their confidence (each 1-5). |
|---|---|
| Reference | Bos-Touwen, I. D., Trappenburg, J. C. A., van der Wulp, I., Schuurmans, M. J., & de Wit, N. J. (2017). Patient factors that influence clinicians' decision making in self-management support: A clinical vignette study. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0171251. |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0171251 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.9g5m2 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 140 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 1,680 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 12 |
| Profiles per task | 1 |
| Attributes | 11 |
| Topic | health covid |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | NL |
| Language shown | nl |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): fixed blocked design: unrealistic combinations removed from the 6,912-cell full factorial (rule not given) before a Fedorov main-effects selection of 96 vignettes in 8 blocks of 12; each respondent saw one block |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | inferred from row order |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead. Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| rating | How likely is it that you will support this patient in self-management? [rating, 1 (Very unlikely) to 5 (very likely)] |
|---|---|
| rating_certainty | I am confident about my answers: [rating, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)] |
| rating_success | How successful do you think self-management support will be in this patient? [rating, 1 (Not at all successful) to 5 (very successful)] |
attr_ageattr_depressionattr_diseaseattr_disease_severityattr_educationattr_illness_perceptionattr_knowledgeattr_motivationattr_provider_relationshipattr_self_efficacyattr_social_supportcov_agecov_gendercov_professionidprofileratingrating_certaintyrating_successtasktrial_blocktrial_vignette
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("bostouwen_2017_selfmanagement", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("bostouwen_2017_selfmanagement", source="conj")
@article{Bos_Touwen_2017, title={Patient factors that influence clinicians’ decision making in self-management support: A clinical vignette study}, volume={12}, ISSN={1932-6203}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171251}, DOI={10.1371/journal.pone.0171251}, number={2}, journal={PLOS ONE}, publisher={Public Library of Science (PLoS)}, author={Bos-Touwen, Irene D. and Trappenburg, Jaap C. A. and van der Wulp, Ineke and Schuurmans, Marieke J. and de Wit, Niek J.}, editor={Asnani, Monika R.}, year={2017}, month=Feb, pages={e0171251} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |