blauberger_2025_sanctions_pl

20,100 rated or chosen profiles from 2,010 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.

One of 3 tables from the same source; this one is the pl table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

DescriptionRespondents in Poland (n = 2,010) each compared 5 pairs of hypothetical EU sanction proposals against their country (framing of the accusation, consequence, number of supporting EU states, domestic opposition stance, government response procedure, trigger), choosing one and rating each 1-7. Outcomes: choice and rating.
ReferenceBlauberger, M., Makaradze, S., & Spilker, G. (2025). International sanctions and domestic backlash. Exploring public support towards the EU's rule of law enforcement. European Union Politics, 27(1), 60-87.
DOI10.1177/14651165251395302
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9ZDOWV

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents2,010
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)20,100
Tasks per respondent (most)5
Profiles per task2
Attributes6
Tasks with no profile chosen0

Design

Topicforeign policy security
A profile representspolicy
CountryPL
Language shownunknown
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsunknown
Task orderinferred from row order
Profile positioninferred from row order

Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.

Outcomes:

choiceWhich of the two sanction proposals do you prefer? (paraphrase; variable label 'proposal forced choice: 1= chosen') [choice, forced]
ratingSupport for sanction proposal: 1 (no support) to 7 (high support) (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (no support) to 7 (high support)]

Columns

attr_accusationattr_consequenceattr_dom_oppositionattr_other_eu_statesattr_responseattr_triggerchoicecov_age2cov_blamecov_education2cov_gendercov_income2cov_partisanshipcov_ruralidprofileratingtask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("blauberger_2025_sanctions_pl", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("blauberger_2025_sanctions_pl", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Blauberger_2025, title={International sanctions and domestic backlash. Exploring public support towards the EU’s rule of law enforcement}, volume={27}, ISSN={1741-2757}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14651165251395302}, DOI={10.1177/14651165251395302}, number={1}, journal={European Union Politics}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Blauberger, Michael and Makaradze, Soso and Spilker, Gabriele}, year={2025}, month=Dec, pages={60–87} }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0