23,945 rated or chosen profiles from 1,627 respondents, in up to 10 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.
| Description | US adults (SSI online panel, January 2014; 1,627 respondents) compared 7 or 10 pairs of hypothetical immigrants on six attributes including religion and religious attendance, choosing which to admit and rating each 1-7 on admission. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Berinsky, A. J., Rizzo, T., Rosenzweig, L. R., & Heaps, E. (2020). Attribute affinity: U.S. natives' attitudes toward immigrants. Political Behavior, 42(3), 745-768. |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11109-018-9518-9 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FRGHVR |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,627 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 23,945 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 10 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 6 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | immigration asylum |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | US |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): Atheist immigrant always has religious attendance 'Never'. Level weights: Atheist drawn far less often than the other five religions (796 of 23,945 kept profiles vs ~4,600 each) |
| Task order | inferred from row order |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead. Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| choice | Please choose one: [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating | On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates that the United States should absolutely not admit the immigrant and 7 indicates that the United States should definitely admit the immigrant, how would you rate Immigrant 1 and Immigrant 2? [rating, 1 (Absolutely not admit the immigrant) to 7 (Definitely admit the immigrant)] |
attr_attendsattr_countryattr_educationattr_genderattr_languageattr_religionchoicecov_attendscov_believe_godcov_birth_yearcov_deport_illegalcov_educationcov_employedcov_ft_agnosticcov_ft_asiancov_ft_atheistcov_ft_buddhistcov_ft_businesscov_ft_catholiccov_ft_feministcov_ft_hinducov_ft_jewishcov_ft_mormoncov_ft_muslimcov_ft_orthodoxcov_ft_protestantcov_ft_workingclasscov_gendercov_legal_immigrationcov_other_language_homecov_party_idcov_race_asiancov_race_blackcov_race_latinocov_race_middleeastcov_race_nativeamericancov_race_othercov_race_whitecov_religioncov_religion_importancecov_statecov_strong_demcov_strong_repidprofileratingtask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("berinsky_2020_immigrant_admission", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("berinsky_2020_immigrant_admission", source="conj")
@article{Berinsky_2018, title={Attribute Affinity: U.S. Natives’ Attitudes Toward Immigrants}, volume={42}, ISSN={1573-6687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9518-9}, DOI={10.1007/s11109-018-9518-9}, number={3}, journal={Political Behavior}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Berinsky, Adam J. and Rizzo, Tesalia and Rosenzweig, Leah R. and Heaps, Elisha}, year={2018}, month=Dec, pages={745–768} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |