11,800 rated or chosen profiles from 1,180 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 5 attributes.

About this table

Description	1,180 UK respondents (Lucid, August 2022) compared 5 pairs of hypothetical government energy policies varying energy source, funding, import restrictions, subsidies and support scheme, after a randomized framing message (control, economy, security). Outcomes: forced choice between the two policies and 1-5 support for each.
Reference	Beiser-McGrath, L. F. (2024). Energy policy preferences in times of crisis: Evidence from survey experiments in the UK. Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, 5(4), 555-579.
DOI	10.1561/113.00000111
Licence	CC0 1.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/RUNQHV

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint). Outcomes: forced choice "Which policy do you prefer?" and "How much do you support or oppose <Policy>?" rated 1-5 (5 = strongly support, direction from the authors' recode; no value labels deposited). No opt-out. trial_frame is the randomized framing arm shown before the conjoint. The article says 149 attention-check failures were removed from 1,180, but the deposit holds all 1,180 and the authors' models use them. Qualtrics IDs re-keyed; ambiguous cost-of-living binaries dropped.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	1,180
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	11,800
Tasks per respondent (most)	5
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	5
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	climate energy environment
A profile represents	policy
Country	GB
Language shown	en
Language of stored levels	en
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Which policy do you prefer? [choice, forced]
rating	How much do you support or oppose <Policy A>? [rating, 1 (Strongly Oppose) to 5 (Strongly Support)]

Columns

attr_energy_sourceattr_fundingattr_import_restrictionsattr_subsidiesattr_support_schemechoicecov_age_groupcov_brexit_votecov_educ_categcov_gendercov_nationcov_party_idcov_ukr_intervention_supportidprofileratingtasktrial_frame

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("beisermcgrath_2024_energy_policy", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("beisermcgrath_2024_energy_policy", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Beiser_McGrath_2024, title={Energy Policy Preferences in Times of Crisis: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the UK}, volume={5}, ISSN={2689-4823}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/113.00000111}, DOI={10.1561/113.00000111}, number={4}, journal={Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy}, publisher={Emerald}, author={Beiser-McGrath, Liam F.}, year={2024}, month=Dec, pages={555–579} }

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v4.2
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0