bechtel_2022_disaster_relief

20,944 rated or chosen profiles from 2,618 respondents, in up to 4 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 6 attributes.

About this table

Description2,618 US citizens (Respondi online quota panel, December 2016) each split $10 million of disaster relief between two hypothetical disaster-hit counties in 4 tasks; counties varied economic damage, fatalities, household income, unemployment and 2012 presidential vote, with the president's party varied per task. Outcome: amount allocated (rating, $ million, 0-10).
ReferenceBechtel, M. M., & Mannino, M. (2022). Retrospection, fairness, and economic shocks: How do voters judge policy responses to natural disasters? Political Science Research and Methods, 10(2), 260-278.
DOI10.1017/psrm.2020.39
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/JRLYVN

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents2,618
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)20,944
Tasks per respondent (most)4
Profiles per task2
Attributes6

Design

Topictax welfare economy
A profile representsplace
CountryUS
Language shownen
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsyes (stated by the source): attr_president is randomized per task and held equal for both counties of a task; all county attributes fully randomized
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positionrecorded in the deposit

Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.

Outcomes:

ratingPlease distribute a total of $10 million in relief aid between the two affected counties (contribution to region A / region B) (paraphrase) [rating, 0 ($0) to 10 ($10 million)]

Columns

attr_economic_damageattr_fatalitiesattr_household_incomeattr_presidentattr_presvote_2012attr_unemploymentattrpos_economic_damageattrpos_fatalitiesattrpos_household_incomeattrpos_presvote_2012attrpos_unemploymentcov_agecov_attention_passcov_educationcov_gendercov_left_rightcov_party_idcov_racecov_survey_weightidprofileratingtask

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("bechtel_2022_disaster_relief", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("bechtel_2022_disaster_relief", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Bechtel_2020, title={Retrospection, fairness, and economic shocks: how do voters judge policy responses to natural disasters?}, volume={10}, ISSN={2049-8489}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.39}, DOI={10.1017/psrm.2020.39}, number={2}, journal={Political Science Research and Methods}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Bechtel, Michael M. and Mannino, Massimo}, year={2020}, month=Nov, pages={260–278} }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0