914 rated or chosen profiles from 914 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 1 profile varying on 2 attributes.
| Description | Moroccan adults (face-to-face national survey, 2023) read one vignette about an MP whose gender/mode of election (district vs gender quota) and collaboration (own party vs other parties) were randomized, and rated the MP's competence, pawn-likeness and cooperativeness on 1-10 scales. 914 respondents. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Barnett, C., Blackman, A., & Shalaby, M. (2025). Competent legislators or mere pawns? Experimental evidence of attitudes toward gender quota politicians. Political Science Research and Methods, 13(4). |
| DOI | 10.1017/psrm.2024.69 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HXLRBY |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 914 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 914 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 1 |
| Profiles per task | 1 |
| Attributes | 2 |
| Topic | candidate choice |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | MA |
| Language shown | unknown |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): attr_politician has three arms (man district-elected, woman district-elected, woman quota-elected) with probabilities 0.25/0.25/0.50; gender x election mode is not crossed (no quota man); attr_collaboration 0.5/0.5, independent of attr_politician |
| Task order | inferred from row order |
| Profile position | inferred from row order |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead. Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| rating_competence | If you had to rate this politician on a scale from 1-10, how would you rate him/her in terms of competence? [rating, 1 (unknown) to 10 (unknown)] |
|---|---|
| rating_cooperation | If you had to rate this politician on a scale from 1-10, how would you rate whether this politician is cooperative? [rating, 1 (unknown) to 10 (unknown)] |
| rating_pawnlike | If you had to rate this politician on a scale from 1-10, how would you rate whether this politician is a pawn of party elites? [rating, 1 (unknown) to 10 (unknown)] |
attr_collaborationattr_politiciancov_agecov_bs_cherishcov_bs_moralcov_educationcov_employedcov_gendercov_govt_satiscov_hs_controlcov_hs_offendedcov_hs_workcov_in_laborforcecov_manip_correctcov_married_widowedcov_ms_antagonismcov_ms_denial_1cov_ms_denial_2cov_ms_denial_3cov_ms_resentmentcov_religiositycov_ses_subjcov_trust_in_electionscov_unemployedcov_urbancov_vote_2021cov_women_decisioncov_women_jobscov_women_leadersidprofilerating_competencerating_cooperationrating_pawnliketask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("barnett_2025_quota_politicians", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("barnett_2025_quota_politicians", source="conj")
@article{Barnett_2025, title={Competent legislators or mere pawns? Experimental evidence of attitudes toward gender quota politicians}, volume={13}, ISSN={2049-8489}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2024.69}, DOI={10.1017/psrm.2024.69}, number={4}, journal={Political Science Research and Methods}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Barnett, Carolyn and Blackman, Alexandra and Shalaby, Marwa}, year={2025}, month=Jan, pages={994–1007} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |