149,660 rated or chosen profiles from 14,966 respondents, in up to 5 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 9 attributes.
| Description | Adults in 15 European countries (n=14,966, Respondi online panels, May-June 2022) evaluated 5 pairs of hypothetical asylum seekers on 9 attributes; forced choice of which to let stay and a 1-7 rating of each. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2023). Europeans' support for refugees of varying background is stable over time. Nature, 620(7975), 849-854. |
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-023-06417-6 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FTL1MM |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 14,966 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 149,660 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 5 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 9 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | immigration asylum |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | AT, CZ, DK, FR, DE, GR, HU, IT, NL, NO, PL, ES, SE, CH, GB |
| Language shown | unknown |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Now imagine that you had to choose one applicant who would be allowed to stay in [Respondent's Country], and the other applicant would be sent back to their own country of origin. Which of the two applicants would you personally prefer to be allowed to stay in [Respondent's Country]? [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating | On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates that [Respondent's Country] should absolutely send the applicant back to their country of origin and 7 indicates that [Respondent's Country] should definitely allow the applicant to stay, how would you rate each of the asylum seekers described above? [rating, 1 (absolutely send the applicant back) to 7 (definitely allow the applicant to stay)] |
attr_ageattr_asylum_testimonyattr_country_of_originattr_genderattr_language_skillsattr_previous_occupationattr_reason_for_migratingattr_religionattr_vulnerabilitychoicecov_agecov_asy_change_europecov_asy_change_homecov_cosmo_1cov_cosmo_2cov_cosmo_3cov_cosmo_4cov_countrycov_educationcov_emp_statuscov_eu_viewcov_feel_therm_afgcov_feel_therm_compatscov_feel_therm_ericov_feel_therm_iracov_feel_therm_koscov_feel_therm_pakcov_feel_therm_syrcov_feel_therm_ukrcov_gendercov_home_borncov_ideocov_immig_change_homecov_inc_decilecov_nat_1cov_nat_2cov_nat_3cov_nat_4cov_nato_intervenecov_nato_viewcov_rus_invas_threatcov_rus_milit_threatcov_rus_polec_threatcov_survey_weightcov_survey_weight_altidprofileratingtasktrial_frame
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("bansak_2023_asylum_2022", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("bansak_2023_asylum_2022", source="conj")
@article{Bansak_2023, title={Europeans’ support for refugees of varying background is stable over time}, volume={620}, ISSN={1476-4687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06417-6}, DOI={10.1038/s41586-023-06417-6}, number={7975}, journal={Nature}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Bansak, Kirk and Hainmueller, Jens and Hangartner, Dominik}, year={2023}, month=Aug, pages={849–854} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |