39,400 rated or chosen profiles from 1,970 respondents, in up to 10 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 9 attributes.
One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the spain table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | Paired conjoint in which 1,970 adults in Spain (Bilendi online panel, January 2019) chose between and rated 10 pairs of austerity packages combining percentage cuts to five spending areas and increases in three taxes, with a party endorsement on the last five pairs for a random half. Outcomes: forced choice and a 1-10 referendum vote rating; survey weight included. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Bansak, K., Bechtel, M. M., & Margalit, Y. (2021). Why austerity? The mass politics of a contested policy. American Political Science Review, 115(2), 486-505. |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0003055420001136 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/JH5UU8 |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,970 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 39,400 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 10 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 9 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | tax welfare economy |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | policy |
| Country | ES |
| Language shown | es |
| Language of stored levels | es |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Which of the two packages do you prefer? (paraphrase) [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating | If you could vote on each of these options in a referendum, how likely is it that you would vote in favor or against each of the options? (translated) [rating, 1 (Vote definitely against) to 10 (Vote definitely in favor)] |
attr_corporate_taxattr_defence_cutattr_education_cutattr_income_taxattr_partyattr_pension_cutattr_public_jobs_cutattr_sales_taxattr_welfare_cutchoicecov_agecov_aust_prefcov_eisced_codecov_empathy1cov_empathy2cov_employedcov_gendercov_gov_competentcov_gov_dorightcov_gov_intcov_gov_redcov_ideo11cov_inc_decilecov_know_infcov_know_pmcov_know_termcov_know_unempcov_layoffcov_mortcov_num_childcov_own_stockscov_party_votecov_public_inccov_public_jobcov_survey_weightcov_union_memcov_votedidprofileratingtasktrial_block_ordertrial_endorsement_arm
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("bansak_2021_austerity_spain", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("bansak_2021_austerity_spain", source="conj")
@article{BANSAK_2021, title={Why Austerity? The Mass Politics of a Contested Policy}, volume={115}, ISSN={1537-5943}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420001136}, DOI={10.1017/s0003055420001136}, number={2}, journal={American Political Science Review}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={BANSAK, KIRK and BECHTEL, MICHAEL M. and MARGALIT, YOTAM}, year={2021}, month=Feb, pages={486–505} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint_2 v1.4 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/hk97-wv30 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v1.4 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |