arora2025_blueq_pedagogical

400 responses from 40 respondents to 10 items.

About this table

DescriptionBLUE-Q Section 1 (Pedagogical Usability); blended learning course evaluation; 40 interprofessional clinicians (Canada); 1-5 Likert; 10 items
ReferenceArora, A. K., Myers, J., Apramian, T., Kulasegaram, K., Bainbridge, D., & Seow, H. (2025). Reliability and construct validation of the Blended Learning Usability Evaluation–Questionnaire with interprofessional clinicians in Canada: a methodological study.
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ZZPUWB

Size and shape

Responses400
Respondents40
Items10
Response categories4
Responses per respondent10
Responses per item40
Density1
LongitudinalFALSE

Classification

sampleProgram-based, Workplace
measurement toolSurvey/questionnaire
item formatLikert Scale/selected response
primary language(s)eng

Item text

This table has item text in the IRW: the wording administered to respondents, not just the response codes.

InstrumentBlended Learning Usability Evaluation-Questionnaire (BLUE-Q)
Mean words per item16.800
Mean characters per item105.400
Mean characters per response8.500
Flesch-Kincaid grade level9.504

Columns

cov_gendercov_roleiditemresp

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python:

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("arora2025_blueq_pedagogical")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("arora2025_blueq_pedagogical")

Version and provenance

IRW versionv393
Redivis datasetitem_response_warehouse_2 v19.0
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qtx5-4m80
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv19.0
Metadata sourceirw_meta v23.0