18,952 rated or chosen profiles from 1,085 respondents, in up to 9 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 7 attributes.
One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the us table. The others are listed under Related tables.
| Description | US adults compared pairs of hypothetical migrant applicants (gender, language fluency, occupation, origin, reason for migration incl. climate reasons, religion, vulnerability) over 9 tasks; 1,085 respondents. Outcomes: 1-7 rating of whether their state should admit each migrant, and a forced choice of which one may stay. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Arias, S. B., & Blair, C. W. (2022). Changing tides: Public attitudes on climate migration. The Journal of Politics, 84(1), 560-567. |
| DOI | 10.1086/715163 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FDML2N |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,085 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 18,952 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 9 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 7 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | immigration asylum |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | US |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Outcomes:
| choice | Now imagine that you had to choose one applicant who would be allowed to stay in your state, and the other applicant would be sent back to their own location of origin. Which of the two applicants would you personally prefer to be allowed to stay in your state? [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating | On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates that your state should absolutely not admit the migrant and 7 indicates that your state should definitely admit the migrant, how would you rate Migrant 1? [rating, 1 (your state should absolutely not admit the migrant) to 7 (your state should definitely admit the migrant)] |
attr_genderattr_language_fluencyattr_occupationattr_originattr_reasonattr_religionattr_vulnerabilityattrpos_genderattrpos_language_fluencyattrpos_occupationattrpos_originattrpos_reasonattrpos_religionattrpos_vulnerabilitychoicecov_agecov_gender_codecov_native_borncov_stateidprofileratingtask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("arias_2022_climate_migrants_us", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("arias_2022_climate_migrants_us", source="conj")
@article{Arias_2022, title={Changing Tides: Public Attitudes on Climate Migration}, volume={84}, ISSN={1468-2508}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/715163}, DOI={10.1086/715163}, number={1}, journal={The Journal of Politics}, publisher={University of Chicago Press}, author={Arias, Sabrina B. and Blair, Christopher W.}, year={2022}, month=Jan, pages={560–567} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |