2,851 rated or chosen profiles from 1,429 respondents, in up to 1 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.
| Description | Colombian adults in a face-to-face Ipsos survey compared two hypothetical migrants (Venezuelan or Peruvian, varying on skills, age, gender, family, ideology, Colombian relatives and reason for migrating) in one paired task; 1,429 respondents. Outcomes: which migrant is preferred (choice) and a 1-7 support rating. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Argote, P., & Daly, S. Z. (2024). The formation of attitudes toward immigration in Colombia. International Interactions, 50(2), 370-384. |
| DOI | 10.1080/03050629.2024.2309999 |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0K48FZ |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 1,429 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 2,851 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 1 |
| Profiles per task | 2 |
| Attributes | 8 |
| Tasks with no profile chosen | 0 |
| Topic | immigration asylum |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | CO |
| Language shown | es |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | unknown |
| Task order | inferred from row order |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Task order or profile position was rebuilt from row order; analyses of position or task order should leave it out.
Outcomes:
| choice | Next, I will read you a description of two potential immigrants who wish to live in Colombia. If you were to decide which of these two immigrants to admit to Colombia, which would you choose? (translated) [choice, forced] |
|---|---|
| rating | On a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 means that the Colombian government should definitely not admit this immigrant, and 7 means that the government should definitely admit this immigrant, how would you rate each immigrant? (translated) [rating, 1 (the Colombian government should definitely not admit this immigrant) to 7 (the government should definitely admit this immigrant)] |
attr_ageattr_colombian_relativesattr_countryattr_genderattr_ideologyattr_reasonattr_skillsattr_travellingchoicecov_agecov_education_codecov_gendercov_nsecov_regioncov_urbanidprofileratingtask
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("argote_2024_migrants_colombia", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("argote_2024_migrants_colombia", source="conj")
@article{Argote_2024, title={The formation of attitudes toward immigration in Colombia}, volume={50}, ISSN={1547-7444}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2024.2309999}, DOI={10.1080/03050629.2024.2309999}, number={2}, journal={International Interactions}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Argote, Pablo and Daly, Sarah Zukerman}, year={2024}, month=Feb, pages={370–384} }
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint v4.2 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/qkye-q530 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v4.2 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |