2,245 rated or chosen profiles from 190 respondents, in up to 12 tasks of 1 profile varying on 9 attributes.
| Description | 190 employers and recruiters in Oman each rated 12 text resumes of graduate applicants (one deck of a 144-vignette fractional design, one occupation per respondent) varying nine attributes (gender, nationality, experience, activities, place of study, education, field, GPA, referral); outcomes: hire likelihood and trainability, 0-100. |
|---|---|
| Reference | Al Hatmi, K. (2026). Social networks, gender, and graduate hiring in a rentier state: Disentangling referral types and ascriptive signals in Omani labour markets. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. |
| Licence | CC0 1.0 |
| Source data | https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/R2W8AW |
These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.
| Respondents | 190 |
|---|---|
| Rows (one per respondent, task and profile) | 2,245 |
| Tasks per respondent (most) | 12 |
| Profiles per task | 1 |
| Attributes | 9 |
| Topic | labour hiring |
|---|---|
| A profile represents | person |
| Country | OM |
| Language shown | en |
| Language of stored levels | en |
| Randomization restrictions | yes (stated by the source): fixed fractional design: only 144 designed vignettes (SAS D-efficient fractional factorial), 12 decks of 12; all respondents of a deck saw the same vignettes |
| Task order | recorded in the deposit |
| Profile position | recorded in the deposit |
Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.
Outcomes:
| rating_hire | How likely is it that you would hire this applicant? [rating, 0 (unknown) to 100 (unknown)] |
|---|---|
| rating_train | If this applicant is hired, how likely is it that the applicant would be easy to train to meet the job demands? (wording from the design document) [rating, 0 (unknown) to 100 (unknown)] |
attr_educationattr_experienceattr_extracurricularattr_fieldattr_genderattr_gradeattr_nationalityattr_place_of_studyattr_referralcov_age_groupcov_educationcov_gendercov_nationalityidprofilerating_hirerating_traintasktrial_decktrial_job_type
The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.
Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):
# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("alhatmi_2026_oman_graduate_hiring", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw
import irw
df = irw.fetch("alhatmi_2026_oman_graduate_hiring", source="conj")
@misc{https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/r2w8aw,
doi = {10.7910/DVN/R2W8AW},
url = {https://dataverse.harvard.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/R2W8AW},
author = {Al Hatmi, Khalifa},
keywords = {Social Sciences},
title = {A dataset of employers’ hiring decision factors in Oman, examining what organizations look for when recruiting graduates and the underlying reasons},
publisher = {Harvard Dataverse},
year = {2026}
}
| IRW version | v584 |
|---|---|
| Redivis dataset | irw_conjoint_2 v1.4 |
| Redivis dataset DOI | 10.57761/hk97-wv30 |
| Manifest pin for this IRW version | v1.4 |
| Metadata source | irw_meta v44.0 |