2,664 rated or chosen profiles from 222 respondents, in up to 6 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 5 attributes.

About this table

Description	Discrete choice experiment in Chile's Los Lagos region: 222 marine resource users (181 individual respondents and 41 institutional respondents, flagged) chose between two policy bundles for strengthening marine user rights that differ in AMERB regime, surveillance, distance, transferability and production limits. 6 comparisons each, forced choice.
Reference	Albers, H. J., Chavez, C., Dissanayake, S., Dresdner, J., & Rakshit, A. (2026). Supporting and augmenting marine user rights: What do resource users want? Evidence from Chile [Manuscript; replication data and code]. Mendeley Data.
Licence	CC BY 4.0
Source data	https://doi.org/10.17632/w2x33kmwhc

Notes

Conjoint table (irw_conjoint_2). Forced choice between two policy bundles (Alternativa 1 or 2) described by AMERB regime, surveillance, distance, transferability and production limits; 6 comparisons per respondent from 36 design rows in 6 blocks (fixed blocked design); level text is the Spanish text of the design sheet. 222 respondents after the authors' 6-record rule (181 individual, 41 institutional flagged in cov_institutional); the question wording is not documented.

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents	222
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)	2,664
Tasks per respondent (most)	6
Profiles per task	2
Attributes	5
Tasks with no profile chosen	0

Design

Topic	climate energy environment
A profile represents	policy
Country	CL
Language shown	es
Language of stored levels	es
Randomization restrictions	unknown
Task order	recorded in the deposit
Profile position	recorded in the deposit

Outcomes:

choice	Which of the two policy bundles do you choose? (paraphrase of 'Policy bundle chosen'; survey wording not in the deposit) [choice, forced]

Columns

attr_amerbattr_distanceattr_production_limitsattr_surveillanceattr_transferabilitychoicecov_institutionalidprofiletasktrial_block

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account needed Browse on Redivisexplore and query Croissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("albers_2026_marine_user_rights", source = "conj")

# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("albers_2026_marine_user_rights", source="conj")

How to cite

@misc{https://doi.org/10.17632/w2x33kmwhc,
  doi = {10.17632/W2X33KMWHC},
  url = {https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/w2x33kmwhc},
  author = {Albers, Heidi J. and Chávez, Carlos and Dissanayake, Sahan and Dresdner, Jorge and Rakshit, Avishek},
  keywords = {Marine Policy, Marine Natural Resource Management, Choice Experiment},
  title = {Supporting and Augmenting Marine User Rights: What Do Resource Users Want? Evidence from Chile},
  publisher = {Mendeley Data},
  year = {2026}
}

Version and provenance

IRW version	v584
Redivis dataset	irw_conjoint_2 v1.4
Redivis dataset DOI	10.57761/hk97-wv30
Manifest pin for this IRW version	v1.4
Metadata source	irw_meta v44.0