ahlen_2026_family_reunification

49,428 rated or chosen profiles from 4,119 respondents, in up to 6 tasks of 2 profiles varying on 8 attributes.

One of 2 tables from the same source; this one is the family_reunification table. The others are listed under Related tables.

About this table

DescriptionPaired conjoint on family reunification: 4,119 adults in Germany, Italy and Sweden (online, Feb-Mar 2024) chose which of two fictitious resident family members should be allowed to bring a family member, in 6 pairs varying migration background, language, legal status, work, economic resources, gender, religion and religiosity, and rated each 1-7.
ReferenceAhlén, A., Borevi, K., Gschwind, L., Hultin Rosenberg, J., & Wejryd, J. (2026). Universalist attitudes to family migration in Germany, Italy and Sweden: A new 'opinion-policy gap'. European Union Politics.
DOI10.1177/14651165261463044
LicenceCC0 1.0
Source datahttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KQ1FZX

Notes

These notes describe the source data, which the IRW reproduces as released. All notes are listed on the Data Notes page.

Size and shape

Respondents4,119
Rows (one per respondent, task and profile)49,428
Tasks per respondent (most)6
Profiles per task2
Attributes8
Tasks with no profile chosen0

Design

Topicimmigration asylum
A profile representsperson
CountryDE, IT, SE
Language shownde, it, sv
Language of stored levelsen
Randomization restrictionsobserved in the data (not documented by the source): never observed: 'Born in the country with both parents born in the country' with Permanent or Temporary residency or with 'Does not speak language'; 'Born in the country with both parents born abroad' with Temporary residency. Migration-background levels each ~20%, but legal status (Citizenship ~49%) and language (fluent ~58%) shares are unequal as a consequence of the restrictions
Task orderrecorded in the deposit
Profile positionrecorded in the deposit

Because the attribute levels were not randomized independently, an estimator has to account for the restriction; a plain difference in means across levels can mislead.

Outcomes:

choiceWhich of the two resident family members should be allowed to bring their family member to the country? (paraphrase) [choice, forced]
ratingRating of the resident family member's case for family reunification, 1-7 (paraphrase) [rating, 1 (unknown) to 7 (unknown)]

Columns

attr_economyattr_genderattr_languageattr_legal_statusattr_migration_backgroundattr_religionattr_religiosityattr_workchoicecov_age_groupcov_birth_origincov_citizencov_countrycov_educationcov_gendercov_homecov_leftrightcov_occupationidprofileratingtasktrial_incoming_origin

The layout (one row per respondent, task and profile; choice/rating outcomes; attr_ columns holding each attribute level as displayed) is defined in the IRW conjoint standard. What the outcomes asked is under Design above.

Get the data

Download CSVno account neededBrowse on Redivisexplore and queryCroissant metadataHugging Face, Kaggle, OpenML

Or load it directly in R or Python (both need a free Redivis account; the first call opens a browser to sign in):

# R
install.packages("remotes")
remotes::install_github("itemresponsewarehouse/Rpkg")
library(irw)
df <- irw_fetch("ahlen_2026_family_reunification", source = "conj")
# Python
pip install irw

import irw
df = irw.fetch("ahlen_2026_family_reunification", source="conj")

How to cite

@article{Ahl_n_2026, title={Universalist attitudes to family migration in Germany, Italy and Sweden: A new ‘opinion–policy gap’}, ISSN={1741-2757}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14651165261463044}, DOI={10.1177/14651165261463044}, journal={European Union Politics}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Ahlén, Anton and Borevi, Karin and Gschwind, Lutz and Hultin Rosenberg, Jonas and Wejryd, Johan}, year={2026}, month=July }

Version and provenance

IRW versionv584
Redivis datasetirw_conjoint v4.2
Redivis dataset DOI10.57761/qkye-q530
Manifest pin for this IRW versionv4.2
Metadata sourceirw_meta v44.0